|
|
Hindus are in minority in UP:
HC
(TIMES NEWS NETWORK)
LUCKNOW: If India could be partitioned in two nations on the basis of
12.58% population of Muslims, the present population of 18.5% makes
Muslims in UP a more dominant group in comparison to any other
religious community and cannot be treated as religious minority
community, writes Justice S N Srivastava of the Allahabad HC in his
detailed order in the civil suit filed by Anjuman Madarsa Noorul Islam
Dehra Kalan.
While this partially explains the earlier operative order which said
that Muslims were no longer a minority in UP, the interesting part of
the detailed judgment makes out a case for a minority status of
Hindus.
The question raised is whether Hindus are members of one religious
group or identity or are a combination of various religious groups
like Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Arya Samajis, Shakts, Shaivites,
Lingayats. The judge asked, “In case these groups could be considered
within Hinduism, then how did the government of India declare Sikhs
and Buddhists as religious minority groups?”
And if these groups are treated as minority, “the rest of religious
groups born and brought up in India, if taken separately, may be
treated in minority” vis a vis Muslims at least in UP where their
population is 18.6% and in some districts ranges from 21% to 49%.
Justice Srivastava also said that although the Central govt has
notified Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Zoroastrians as
minority communities, it did not provide any record to show the
criterion for determining a religious minority, a term which has not
been defined by the Constitution.
Justice Srivastava’s operative order of April 5 had caused a furore
and was stayed by a division bench of Justice SR Alam and Justice
Krishna Murari the very next day.
While ruling that Muslims were no longer a minority, Justice
Srivastava drew extensively from the Constituent Assembly debate and
SC’s oft-quoted judgment in the TMA Pai case. The judgment reproduces
the Constituent Assembly deliberations on the rights of minorities
which also discussed the demand for special rights, including
proportionate representation, for Muslims.
Replying to the entire debate, the president of the Advisory Committee
on Minority said, “My friend the Mover of this amendment says the
Muslim community today is a strong-knit community. Very good, I am
glad to hear that, and therefore I say you have no business to ask for
any props. Because there are other minorities who are not well
organised, and deserve special consideration and some safeguards, we
want to be generous to them...”
An 11-judge bench of SC which defined minority had said in the Pai
case, “The word minority is not defined in the Constitution but
literally it means “a non-dominant group. It is a relative term and is
referred to represent the smaller of two numbers, sections or group
called majority. In that sense here may be political minority,
religious minority, linguistic minority.”
In his detailed order released recently, Justice Srivastava also
explained why the court is competent to decide “an issue of public
importance which arose in a case where initially the matter was in the
nature of private dispute”.
In this context he quoted SC judgment in the Guruvayoor Devaswom
Managing Committee case according to which, “In an appropriate case,
although the petitioner might have moved a court in his private
interest and for redressal of personal grievances, the court in
furtherance of the public interest may treat it necessary to enquire
into the state of affairs of the subject of litigation in the interest
of justice.”
The full bench of the Allahabad High Court had also ruled in a case
that “it was within the domain of the court even to enquire the facts
of public importance suo moto if exigency so requires...”
Mother and Motherland are greater than heaven.
(Jananee janmabhoomischa swargaadapi gareeyasi)
Lord Rama In the Ramayana
|